24-09-08, 02:19
|
# 1 |
|
חבר בקהילה
|
בעיה מוזרה באתר,מה עושים?
יש לי בעיה באתר שאני מנסה לקדם:Potential Issues
The following missing or conflicting information caused the validator to perform guesswork prior to validation. If the guess or fallback is incorrect, it may make validation results entirely incoherent. It is highly recommended to check these potential issues, and, if necessary, fix them and re-validate the document. No Character Encoding Found! Falling back to windows-1252. None of the standards sources gave any information on the character encoding labeling for this document. Without encoding information it is impossible to reliably validate the document. As a fallback solution, the "windows-1252" encoding was used to read the content and attempt to perform the validation, but this is likely to fail for all non-trivial documents. Before defaulting to windows-1252 the validator also tried to read the content with the following encoding(s), without success: UTF-8. Read the FAQ entry on character encoding for more details and pointers on how to fix this problem with your document. Unable to Determine Parse Mode! The validator can process documents either as XML (for document types such as XHTML, SVG, etc.) or SGML (for HTML 4.01 and prior versions). For this document, the information available was not sufficient to determine the parsing mode unambiguously, because: the MIME Media Type (text/html) can be used for XML or SGML document types No known Document Type could be detected No XML declaration (e.g <?xml version="1.0"?>) could be found at the beginning of the document. No XML namespace (e.g <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">) could be found at the root of the document. As a default, the validator is falling back to SGML mode. No DOCTYPE found, and unknown root element. Aborting validation. The DOCTYPE Declaration was not recognized or is missing. This probably means that the Formal Public Identifier contains a spelling error, or that the Declaration is not using correct syntax, or that your document is not using a DOCTYPE Declaration. Without a DOCTYPE Declaration it is not possible to check the validity of your document. Since the document does not start with the root <html> element, automatic fallback to an HTML document type was not performed, and most of the validation process was aborted: only basic markup syntax was checked. Learn how to add a doctype to your document from our FAQ, or use the validator's Document Type option to validate your document against a specific Document Type. ↑ Top Validation Output: 1 Error Line 1, Column 0: no document type declaration; will parse without validation. <META NAME="description" CONTENT="my site">✉ The document type could not be determined, because the document had no correct DOCTYPE declaration. The document does not look like HTML, therefore automatic fallback could not be performed, and the document was only checked against basic markup syntax. Learn how to add a doctype to your document from our FAQ, or use the validator's Document Type option to validate your document against a specific Document Type. איך אני מתקן זות? מה עושים? טיפים? את האתר אני לא יפרסם בגלל החוקים שכאן. תודה רבה ויום טוב! (איך זה קשור לקידום? כי זה הבעיה בקידום) ועוד בעיה שיש לי: Meta tags analysis. Title: Found no title. The title is used by most of the search engines. Consider to add a title. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description: Description meta tag is too short. This tag contain 7 characters. This is too short for what we would consider a 'robot friendly' description. The minimum number of characters we recommend for this tag is 50. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description meta tag relevancy to page content is terrible. The Description meta tag relevancy to page content is 0%. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords: Keywords meta tag contains too many keywords. This tag contains 52 keywords. This is too many for what we would consider a 'robot friendly' keywords tag. The maximum number of keywords we recommend for this tag is 20. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords meta tag relevancy to page content is terrible. The keywords meta tag relevancy to page content is 0%. מקווה שזה המקום לבקש את עזרתכם בנושא קידום האתר שלי. אשמח לקבל גם סקריפטים וטיפים. תודה רבה!!! !מנהלים קראתי את חוקי הפורום ולא ראיתי שום דבר חריג,מקווה שהכול כשר,תודה! |
|
|
26-09-08, 09:14
|
# 2 |
|
חבר בקהילה
|
UP-אין תגובות וזה חשוב לי מאוד.
תודה רבה! |
|
|
 |
| חברים פעילים הצופים באשכול זה: 1 (0 חברים ו- 1 אורחים) | |
|
|
עבור למצב קווי
